"""Gezielte Tests für kritische, ungetestete Pfade (postgres-expert Audit).

Deckt:
1. Carryover-Expiry über create_absence (kein Fehlsignal "Konto reicht")
2. Teilzeit + Pro-rata gleichzeitig (_compute_entitlement kombiniert)
3. FZA-Rückbuchung via Cancellation-Request-Flow (statt Admin-Direkt-Storno)
4. Zwei-Stufen-Genehmigung: kein Doppelabzug/-gutschrift bei Storno in FIRST_APPROVED
   + Schwellwert-Grenzfall working_days == two_stage_min_days
5. DATEV-Export: Feiertag-Kürzel "F" schlägt Urlaubs-Kürzel "U"; working_days konsistent
6. _categorize_hours: Nachtschicht über Mitternacht + Sonntag+Feiertag (höchster Zuschlag gewinnt)
7. POST /absences/ reicht warnings jetzt durch (API-Konsistenz-Fix)

Nebenbei gefixte Bugs (während dieser Coverage-Arbeit gefunden):
- _get_holiday_dates() rechnete Feiertage im Folgejahr bei Anträgen über den
  Jahreswechsel nicht aus working_days heraus (siehe
  test_holiday_dates_cover_year_boundary + absence_service.py year_to-Parameter)
- POST /absences/ verwarf die warnings-Liste von create_absence() (siehe Test 7)
"""
import pytest
import pytest_asyncio
from datetime import date, time, timedelta
from decimal import Decimal
from httpx import AsyncClient
from sqlalchemy import select, text
from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession

from app.models.company import Company
from app.models.overtime_balance import OvertimeBalance
from app.models.user import User
from app.models.vacation_balance import VacationBalance


# ── Fixtures ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

@pytest_asyncio.fixture(scope="session", loop_scope="session")
async def cov_company(client: AsyncClient):
    resp = await client.post("/api/v1/auth/register", json={
        "company_name": "Coverage Gaps GmbH",
        "first_name": "Cov",
        "last_name": "Admin",
        "email": "admin@covgaps.de",
        "password": "Secret123",
    })
    assert resp.status_code == 201, resp.text
    tokens = resp.json()
    me = await client.get(
        "/api/v1/auth/me",
        headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {tokens['access_token']}"},
    )
    return {"tokens": tokens, "user": me.json()}


@pytest_asyncio.fixture(scope="session", loop_scope="session")
async def cov_headers(cov_company):
    return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {cov_company['tokens']['access_token']}"}


@pytest_asyncio.fixture(scope="session", loop_scope="session")
async def cov_approver_headers(client: AsyncClient, cov_headers):
    """Zweiter Admin – für Genehmigungen, die nicht self-approval sein dürfen."""
    resp = await client.post("/api/v1/users/invite", json={
        "first_name": "Cov", "last_name": "Approver",
        "email": "approver@covgaps.de", "role": "COMPANY_ADMIN",
        "initial_password": "Secret123",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp.status_code == 201, resp.text
    login = await client.post("/api/v1/auth/login", json={
        "email": "approver@covgaps.de", "password": "Secret123",
    })
    assert login.status_code == 200, login.text
    return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {login.json()['access_token']}"}


@pytest_asyncio.fixture(scope="session", loop_scope="session")
async def cov_third_approver_headers(client: AsyncClient, cov_headers):
    """Dritter Admin – für die finale Zwei-Stufen-Genehmigung (andere Person als Stufe 1)."""
    resp = await client.post("/api/v1/users/invite", json={
        "first_name": "Cov", "last_name": "Third",
        "email": "third@covgaps.de", "role": "HR",
        "initial_password": "Secret123",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp.status_code == 201, resp.text
    login = await client.post("/api/v1/auth/login", json={
        "email": "third@covgaps.de", "password": "Secret123",
    })
    assert login.status_code == 200, login.text
    return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {login.json()['access_token']}"}


@pytest_asyncio.fixture(scope="session", loop_scope="session")
async def cov_vacation_type_id(client: AsyncClient, cov_headers):
    resp = await client.get("/api/v1/absence-types/", headers=cov_headers)
    types = resp.json()
    vacation = next((t for t in types if t["name"] == "Urlaub"), types[0])
    return vacation["id"]


@pytest_asyncio.fixture(scope="session", loop_scope="session")
async def cov_fza_type_id(client: AsyncClient, cov_headers):
    resp = await client.post("/api/v1/absence-types/", json={
        "name": "FZA Coverage",
        "category": "overtime_comp",
        "color": "#f97316",
        "requires_approval": True,
        "deducts_vacation": False,
        "affects_overtime_balance": True,
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp.status_code == 201, resp.text
    return resp.json()["id"]


def _future_monday(weeks: int) -> date:
    return date.today() + timedelta(days=(7 - date.today().weekday()) + 7 * weeks)


# ── 1. Carryover-Expiry über echten Integrationspfad ───────────────────────────

@pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")
async def test_carryover_expiry_via_create_absence(
    client: AsyncClient, db_session: AsyncSession, cov_company, cov_headers, cov_vacation_type_id,
):
    """Ein User mit abgelaufenem carried_over-Betrag darf im create_absence-Pfad
    nicht das Signal 'Konto reicht' bekommen, obwohl entitled+carried_over rechnerisch
    reichen würde – der verfallene Übertrag darf effective_available nicht aufblähen.

    Ruft absence_service.create_absence() direkt auf (statt über HTTP) um den
    warnings-Rückgabewert isoliert vom HTTP-Layer zu prüfen (Test 7 unten deckt
    den HTTP-Pfad inkl. warnings-Durchreichung separat ab)."""
    from app.services.absence_service import absence_service
    from app.schemas.absence import AbsenceCreate

    user_id = cov_company["user"]["id"]
    year = date.today().year

    # Firma: Verfallsdatum in der Vergangenheit setzen (z.B. 31.01. dieses Jahr)
    r = await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={
        "settings": {"carryover_expires_month": 1, "carryover_expires_day": 31},
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert r.status_code == 200, r.text

    # RLS-Bypass gilt nur innerhalb der aktuellen Transaktion (SET LOCAL) -- muss
    # daher vor JEDER Query auf diesem "rohen" db_session (ohne app.company_id-
    # Kontext eines eingeloggten Requests) neu gesetzt werden, siehe
    # project_rls_bypass_commit_pitfall in Memory.
    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    user = await db_session.get(User, user_id)
    assert user is not None

    # VacationBalance direkt präparieren: wenig entitled, hoher (verfallener) Übertrag,
    # kaum genutzt -> ohne Verfalls-Logik würde das Konto "reichen"
    balance = await db_session.scalar(
        select(VacationBalance).where(VacationBalance.user_id == user_id, VacationBalance.year == year)
    )
    if balance is None:
        balance = VacationBalance(user_id=user_id, year=year)
        db_session.add(balance)
        await db_session.flush()
    balance.entitled_days = 5
    balance.carried_over = 20
    balance.used_days = 0
    balance.special_days = 0
    await db_session.flush()

    # Antrag über 10 Arbeitstage im selben Jahr wie die präparierte Bilanz (nah
    # in der Zukunft, damit wir nicht ins nächste Jahr rutschen)
    start = _future_monday(1)
    assert start.year == year, "Testannahme verletzt: Zeitraum muss im selben Jahr wie die Bilanz liegen"
    create_data = AbsenceCreate(
        type_id=cov_vacation_type_id,
        start_date=start, end_date=start + timedelta(days=13),  # 2 volle Wochen = 10 Werktage
    )
    absence, warnings = await absence_service.create_absence(create_data, user, db_session)
    assert absence.working_days == 10

    assert any("Urlaubskonto reicht" in w for w in warnings), (
        f"Erwartete Verfalls-Warnung fehlt (Bug: effective_available berücksichtigt Verfall nicht "
        f"im create_absence-Pfad?), warnings={warnings}"
    )
    await db_session.commit()

    # Reset für nachfolgende Tests
    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={"settings": {}}, headers=cov_headers)
    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    bal2 = await db_session.scalar(
        select(VacationBalance).where(VacationBalance.user_id == user_id, VacationBalance.year == year)
    )
    if bal2:
        bal2.entitled_days = 30
        bal2.carried_over = 0
    await db_session.commit()


# ── 2. Teilzeit + Pro-rata gleichzeitig ─────────────────────────────────────────

@pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")
async def test_part_time_prorate_combined(client: AsyncClient, cov_headers):
    """company.vacation_from_schedule=True UND vacation_prorate_first_year=True gleichzeitig:
    Anspruch = default_days * (Arbeitstage/Woche / 5) * (Monate ab Eintritt / 12), gerundet."""
    sched = await client.post("/api/v1/time/schedules", json={
        "name": "Teilzeit 3 Tage Cov", "mon_h": 8, "tue_h": 8, "wed_h": 8,
        "thu_h": 0, "fri_h": 0, "valid_from": "2026-01-01",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert sched.status_code == 201, sched.text
    sid = sched.json()["id"]

    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={
        "vacation_from_schedule": True,
        "vacation_prorate_first_year": True,
        "vacation_default_days": 30,
    }, headers=cov_headers)

    yr = date.today().year
    inv = await client.post("/api/v1/users/invite", json={
        "first_name": "Combo", "last_name": "Case", "email": "combo@covgaps.de",
        "role": "EMPLOYEE", "initial_password": "Secret123",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert inv.status_code == 201, inv.text
    uid = inv.json()["id"]
    await client.patch(f"/api/v1/users/{uid}", json={
        "entry_date": f"{yr}-07-01", "work_schedule_id": sid,
    }, headers=cov_headers)

    bal = await client.get(f"/api/v1/absences/balance/{uid}?year={yr}", headers=cov_headers)
    assert bal.status_code == 200, bal.text

    # 30 * 3/5 = 18 (Teilzeit) * 6/12 (Eintritt Juli -> Monate Jul..Dez = 6) = 9
    # math.floor(9 + 0.5) = 9
    days = 30.0 * 3 / 5.0
    days = days * 6 / 12.0
    import math
    expected = int(math.floor(days + 0.5))
    assert bal.json()["entitled_days"] == expected == 9

    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={
        "vacation_from_schedule": False, "vacation_prorate_first_year": False,
    }, headers=cov_headers)


# ── 3. FZA-Rückbuchung via Cancellation-Request-Flow ────────────────────────────

async def _seed_overtime_balance(db_session: AsyncSession, user_id: str, company_id: str, total_hours: float) -> None:
    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    ob = await db_session.scalar(select(OvertimeBalance).where(OvertimeBalance.user_id == user_id))
    if ob is None:
        ob = OvertimeBalance(user_id=user_id, company_id=company_id, total_hours=Decimal(str(total_hours)))
        db_session.add(ob)
    else:
        ob.total_hours = Decimal(str(total_hours))
        ob.taken_hours = Decimal("0")
    await db_session.flush()


@pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")
async def test_fza_refund_via_cancellation_request_flow(
    client: AsyncClient, db_session: AsyncSession, cov_company, cov_headers,
    cov_approver_headers, cov_fza_type_id,
):
    """Kompletter Storno-Antrags-Flow (nicht der Admin-Direkt-Pfad) für einen
    FZA-Antrag: Antrag -> genehmigt (Konto sinkt) -> Storno beantragt -> Storno
    genehmigt -> Konto muss zurückgebucht sein."""
    emp = await client.post("/api/v1/users/invite", json={
        "first_name": "Fza", "last_name": "Requestor", "email": "fzareq@covgaps.de",
        "role": "EMPLOYEE", "initial_password": "Secret123",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert emp.status_code == 201, emp.text
    emp_id = emp.json()["id"]
    company_id = cov_company["user"]["company_id"]

    await _seed_overtime_balance(db_session, emp_id, company_id, total_hours=40.0)
    await db_session.commit()

    login = await client.post("/api/v1/auth/login", json={
        "email": "fzareq@covgaps.de", "password": "Secret123",
    })
    emp_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {login.json()['access_token']}"}

    start = _future_monday(25)
    resp = await client.post("/api/v1/absences/", json={
        "type_id": cov_fza_type_id, "start_date": str(start), "end_date": str(start),
    }, headers=emp_headers)
    assert resp.status_code == 201, resp.text
    aid = resp.json()["id"]

    approve = await client.post(f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}/approve", headers=cov_approver_headers)
    assert approve.status_code == 200, approve.text

    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    ob = await db_session.scalar(
        select(OvertimeBalance).where(OvertimeBalance.user_id == emp_id)
        .execution_options(populate_existing=True)
    )
    taken_after_approve = float(ob.taken_hours)
    assert taken_after_approve == pytest.approx(8.0, abs=0.1)

    # Mitarbeiter beantragt Storno statt Admin-Direktstorno
    req = await client.post(
        f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}/request-cancellation", json={"reason": "Plan geaendert"},
        headers=emp_headers,
    )
    assert req.status_code == 200, req.text
    assert req.json()["status"] == "cancellation_requested"

    ok = await client.post(f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}/approve", headers=cov_approver_headers)
    assert ok.status_code == 200, ok.text
    assert ok.json()["status"] == "cancelled"

    import asyncio
    await asyncio.sleep(0.15)  # fire-and-forget CalDAV
    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    ob2 = await db_session.scalar(
        select(OvertimeBalance).where(OvertimeBalance.user_id == emp_id)
        .execution_options(populate_existing=True)
    )
    taken_after_cancel = float(ob2.taken_hours)
    assert taken_after_cancel == pytest.approx(0.0, abs=0.1), (
        f"FZA-Rückbuchung über Cancellation-Request-Flow fehlgeschlagen, got {taken_after_cancel}"
    )


# ── 4. Zwei-Stufen-Genehmigung + Storno-Grenzfälle ──────────────────────────────

@pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")
async def test_two_stage_no_double_credit_on_cancellation(
    client: AsyncClient, db_session: AsyncSession, cov_company, cov_headers,
    cov_approver_headers, cov_vacation_type_id,
):
    """Antrag -> FIRST_APPROVED (Stufe 1, KEIN Urlaubsabzug) -> Storno in diesem
    Zustand darf keine Rückbuchung auslösen (es wurde ja nichts gebucht) -> Antrag
    entweder direkt stornierbar oder Cancellation-Request nicht möglich (Business-Regel:
    request_cancellation verlangt Status APPROVED). Konto wird bei jedem Schritt geprüft."""
    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me",
                        json={"two_stage_approval_enabled": True, "two_stage_min_days": 0},
                        headers=cov_headers)

    inv = await client.post("/api/v1/users/invite", json={
        "first_name": "Two", "last_name": "Cov", "email": "twocov@covgaps.de",
        "role": "EMPLOYEE", "initial_password": "Secret123",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert inv.status_code == 201, inv.text
    emp_id = inv.json()["id"]
    login = await client.post("/api/v1/auth/login", json={
        "email": "twocov@covgaps.de", "password": "Secret123",
    })
    emp_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {login.json()['access_token']}"}

    yr = date.today().year
    start = _future_monday(27)
    used_before = (await client.get(
        f"/api/v1/absences/balance/{emp_id}?year={yr}", headers=cov_headers
    )).json()["used_days"]

    cr = await client.post("/api/v1/absences/", json={
        "type_id": str(cov_vacation_type_id), "start_date": str(start),
        "end_date": str(start + timedelta(days=2)),  # 3 Werktage
    }, headers=emp_headers)
    assert cr.status_code == 201, cr.text
    aid = cr.json()["id"]

    # Stufe 1
    r1 = await client.post(f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}/approve", headers=cov_approver_headers)
    assert r1.status_code == 200, r1.text
    assert r1.json()["status"] == "first_approved"

    used_after_first = (await client.get(
        f"/api/v1/absences/balance/{emp_id}?year={yr}", headers=cov_headers
    )).json()["used_days"]
    assert used_after_first == used_before, (
        "Urlaub wurde bereits bei FIRST_APPROVED abgezogen -- Doppelgutschriftsrisiko bei Storno!"
    )

    # Business-Regel prüfen: Storno-Antrag ist bei FIRST_APPROVED (noch nicht APPROVED)
    # explizit nicht erlaubt (nur genehmigte Anträge, siehe request_cancellation).
    req = await client.post(
        f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}/request-cancellation", json={}, headers=emp_headers,
    )
    assert req.status_code == 409, (
        f"Erwartet: Cancellation-Request bei FIRST_APPROVED wird abgelehnt (409), got {req.status_code}"
    )

    # Der Owner kann den Antrag aber direkt stornieren (Storno von PENDING/FIRST_APPROVED
    # ist über cancel_absence/DELETE erlaubt und darf NICHTS zurückbuchen, da nie
    # etwas abgezogen wurde).
    cancel = await client.delete(f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}", headers=emp_headers)
    assert cancel.status_code == 200, cancel.text
    assert cancel.json()["status"] == "cancelled"

    used_after_cancel = (await client.get(
        f"/api/v1/absences/balance/{emp_id}?year={yr}", headers=cov_headers
    )).json()["used_days"]
    assert used_after_cancel == used_before, (
        f"Doppelgutschrift-Bug: used_days veränderte sich durch Storno eines nie abgezogenen "
        f"FIRST_APPROVED-Antrags ({used_before} -> {used_after_cancel})"
    )

    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me",
                        json={"two_stage_approval_enabled": False}, headers=cov_headers)


@pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")
async def test_two_stage_threshold_boundary_equal_triggers_two_stage(
    client: AsyncClient, cov_headers, cov_approver_headers, cov_third_approver_headers, cov_vacation_type_id,
):
    """Grenzfall working_days == two_stage_min_days: Code nutzt >= -> muss zwei Stufen auslösen."""
    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me",
                        json={"two_stage_approval_enabled": True, "two_stage_min_days": 3},
                        headers=cov_headers)

    inv = await client.post("/api/v1/users/invite", json={
        "first_name": "Boundary", "last_name": "Case", "email": "boundary@covgaps.de",
        "role": "EMPLOYEE", "initial_password": "Secret123",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert inv.status_code == 201, inv.text
    login = await client.post("/api/v1/auth/login", json={
        "email": "boundary@covgaps.de", "password": "Secret123",
    })
    emp_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {login.json()['access_token']}"}

    start = _future_monday(29)
    cr = await client.post("/api/v1/absences/", json={
        "type_id": str(cov_vacation_type_id), "start_date": str(start),
        "end_date": str(start + timedelta(days=2)),  # exakt 3 Werktage = Schwelle
    }, headers=emp_headers)
    assert cr.status_code == 201, cr.text
    assert cr.json()["working_days"] == 3
    aid = cr.json()["id"]

    r1 = await client.post(f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}/approve", headers=cov_approver_headers)
    assert r1.status_code == 200, r1.text
    assert r1.json()["status"] == "first_approved", (
        "working_days == two_stage_min_days sollte zwei Stufen auslösen (Code nutzt >=)"
    )

    r2 = await client.post(f"/api/v1/absences/{aid}/approve", headers=cov_third_approver_headers)
    assert r2.status_code == 200, r2.text
    assert r2.json()["status"] == "approved"

    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me",
                        json={"two_stage_approval_enabled": False}, headers=cov_headers)


# ── 5. DATEV-Export: Feiertag vs. Urlaub, working_days-Konsistenz ─────────────

@pytest.mark.asyncio(loop_scope="session")
async def test_datev_holiday_takes_precedence_over_vacation(
    client: AsyncClient, db_session: AsyncSession, cov_company, cov_headers, cov_vacation_type_id,
):
    """Absence, die exakt auf einen Feiertag fällt: DATEV-Zeile zeigt 'F' statt 'U',
    und working_days (Antrag) rechnet den Feiertag korrekt heraus."""
    from app.services.holiday_service import ensure_holidays_for_year
    from app.services.report_service import report_service

    from uuid import UUID as _UUID
    company_id = _UUID(cov_company["user"]["company_id"])
    user_id = _UUID(cov_company["user"]["id"])

    r = await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={"state": "BY"}, headers=cov_headers)
    assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
    r2 = await client.patch(f"/api/v1/users/{user_id}", json={"personnel_number": "4711"}, headers=cov_headers)
    assert r2.status_code == 200, r2.text

    # Feiertage für 2027 vorab befüllen, damit absence_service._get_holiday_dates
    # (fragt PublicHoliday direkt ab, ohne Auto-Generierung) sie kennt.
    # Jahreswechsel-Fall (Feiertag im Folgejahr) siehe separat
    # test_holiday_dates_cover_year_boundary weiter unten -- hier bewusst
    # innerhalb eines einzigen Jahres, um Feiertag-vs-Urlaub-Vorrang isoliert
    # zu prüfen.
    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    await ensure_holidays_for_year(2027, "BY", db_session)
    await db_session.commit()

    # Fr 01.01.2027 (Neujahr, Feiertag) - Di 05.01.2027: 3 Wochentage (Fr/Mo/Di),
    # davon Neujahr ein Feiertag -> 2 Werktage
    start = date(2027, 1, 1)
    end = date(2027, 1, 5)
    resp = await client.post("/api/v1/absences/", json={
        "type_id": str(cov_vacation_type_id), "start_date": str(start), "end_date": str(end),
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp.status_code == 201, resp.text
    data = resp.json()
    assert data["working_days"] == 2, "Feiertag (Neujahr) sollte working_days rausrechnen"

    # Selbst genehmigen geht nicht -> zweiter Admin holen wäre Overkill hier;
    # DATEV-Report berücksichtigt PENDING nicht (nur APPROVED/FIRST_APPROVED),
    # daher separat genehmigen.
    resp2 = await client.post("/api/v1/users/invite", json={
        "first_name": "Datev", "last_name": "Approver", "email": "datevapprover@covgaps.de",
        "role": "COMPANY_ADMIN", "initial_password": "Secret123",
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp2.status_code == 201, resp2.text
    login = await client.post("/api/v1/auth/login", json={
        "email": "datevapprover@covgaps.de", "password": "Secret123",
    })
    approver_headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {login.json()['access_token']}"}
    approve = await client.post(f"/api/v1/absences/{data['id']}/approve", headers=approver_headers)
    assert approve.status_code == 200, approve.text

    # RLS-Bypass gilt nur innerhalb der aktuellen Transaktion (SET LOCAL) -- der
    # vorherige Bypass ist mit dem commit() oben verfallen. expire_all() erzwingt
    # frische Queries unter dem neuen Bypass (statt gecachter Identity-Map-Objekte).
    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    db_session.expire_all()
    sheet = await report_service.datev_monthly_report(company_id, user_id, 2027, 1, db_session)
    jan1_row = next(row for row in sheet.rows if row.day == 1)
    assert jan1_row.code == "F", f"Feiertag muss Vorrang vor Urlaubs-Kürzel haben, got code={jan1_row.code!r}"
    assert "Neujahr" in (jan1_row.note or "")

    # working_days-Konsistenz: Feiertag zählt nicht als Urlaubstag -> Mo/Di (4./5.1.)
    # müssen als 'U' erscheinen (die tatsächlich abgezogenen Werktage).
    day_codes = {row.day: row.code for row in sheet.rows}
    assert day_codes.get(4) == "U"
    assert day_codes.get(5) == "U"

    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={"state": None}, headers=cov_headers)


async def test_holiday_dates_cover_year_boundary(
    client: AsyncClient, db_session: AsyncSession, cov_company, cov_headers, cov_vacation_type_id,
):
    """Regressionstest für den in test_datev_holiday_takes_precedence_over_vacation
    dokumentierten Bug: ein Antrag über den Jahreswechsel muss den Feiertag im
    Folgejahr (Neujahr) korrekt aus working_days herausrechnen. Fix:
    _get_holiday_dates(..., year_to=end_date.year) statt nur start_date.year."""
    from app.services.holiday_service import ensure_holidays_for_year

    r = await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={"state": "BY"}, headers=cov_headers)
    assert r.status_code == 200, r.text

    await db_session.execute(text("SET LOCAL app.bypass_rls = 'on'"))
    await ensure_holidays_for_year(2028, "BY", db_session)
    await ensure_holidays_for_year(2029, "BY", db_session)
    await db_session.commit()

    # Do 28.12.2028 - Mo 01.01.2029: Wochentage Do/Fr (28./29.12.) + Mo (01.01.),
    # Sa/So (30./31.12.) fallen ohnehin raus. Montag 01.01.2029 ist Neujahr
    # (Feiertag) -> 2 Werktage.
    start = date(2028, 12, 28)
    end = date(2029, 1, 1)
    resp = await client.post("/api/v1/absences/", json={
        "type_id": str(cov_vacation_type_id), "start_date": str(start), "end_date": str(end),
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp.status_code == 201, resp.text
    data = resp.json()
    assert data["working_days"] == 2, (
        f"Neujahr (Folgejahr) muss aus working_days herausgerechnet werden, "
        f"got {data['working_days']}"
    )

    await client.patch("/api/v1/companies/me", json={"state": None}, headers=cov_headers)


# ── 6. _categorize_hours: Nacht über Mitternacht + Sonntag/Feiertag ─────────────

def test_categorize_hours_night_shift_over_midnight():
    from app.services.report_service import _categorize_hours

    # 22:00 - 06:00, kein Feiertag, kein Sonntag (Mo -> Di)
    entry_date = date(2026, 6, 1)  # Montag
    result = _categorize_hours(entry_date, time(22, 0), time(6, 0), 0, {})

    # 22:00-24:00 (2h) = night_25, 00:00-04:00 (4h) = night_40, 04:00-06:00 (2h) = night_25
    assert result.night_40_hours == pytest.approx(4.0)
    assert result.night_25_hours == pytest.approx(4.0)
    assert result.normal_hours == pytest.approx(0.0)
    total = (result.normal_hours + result.night_25_hours + result.night_40_hours
             + result.sunday_hours + result.holiday_125_hours + result.holiday_150_hours)
    assert total == pytest.approx(8.0)


def test_categorize_hours_sunday_and_holiday_highest_wins():
    from app.services.report_service import _categorize_hours

    # Sonntag, der gleichzeitig Feiertag (hoher Zuschlag) ist -> holiday_150, nicht
    # sunday + holiday addiert.
    sunday_holiday = date(2026, 12, 25)  # 1. Weihnachtsfeiertag, Freitag in 2026 -> nutze echten Sonntag
    # 2026-12-25 ist ein Freitag; für einen Sonntags-Feiertag nehmen wir ein
    # künstliches Beispiel (Datum ist beliebig, Zuschlagslogik hängt nur vom
    # holidays-dict + weekday ab)
    d = date(2026, 11, 1)  # ein Sonntag
    assert d.weekday() == 6
    holidays = {d: ("Fiktiver Feiertag hoch", True)}

    result = _categorize_hours(d, time(10, 0), time(18, 0), 0, holidays)  # 8h, tagsüber

    assert result.holiday_150_hours == pytest.approx(8.0)
    assert result.sunday_hours == pytest.approx(0.0)
    assert result.holiday_125_hours == pytest.approx(0.0)


# ── 7. POST /absences/ gibt warnings zurück (API-Konsistenz-Fix) ────────────────

async def test_create_absence_returns_warnings(
    client: AsyncClient, cov_headers, cov_vacation_type_id,
):
    """Regressionstest: POST /absences/ verwarf bisher die von create_absence()
    zurückgegebenen warnings (im Unterschied zu approve_absence, das sie über
    AbsenceApproveOut.warnings durchreicht). Fix: neues AbsenceCreateOut-Schema.
    Trigger hier: Überschneidungs-Warnung bei zwei sich überlappenden Anträgen."""
    start = _future_monday(20)
    end = start + timedelta(days=2)

    resp1 = await client.post("/api/v1/absences/", json={
        "type_id": str(cov_vacation_type_id), "start_date": str(start), "end_date": str(end),
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp1.status_code == 201, resp1.text
    assert resp1.json().get("warnings") == []

    # Überlappender zweiter Antrag im selben Zeitraum -> Warnung erwartet
    resp2 = await client.post("/api/v1/absences/", json={
        "type_id": str(cov_vacation_type_id), "start_date": str(start), "end_date": str(end + timedelta(days=1)),
    }, headers=cov_headers)
    assert resp2.status_code == 201, resp2.text
    data2 = resp2.json()
    assert "warnings" in data2
    assert any("Überschneidung" in w for w in data2["warnings"]), data2["warnings"]